BCCLA and Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers sue Harper government to end second-class citizenship in Canada

0

The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association (BCCLA) and Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers (CARL) recently launched a constitutional challenge vs. Harper-inspired Bill C-24, which creates two classes of Canadian citizens.

“We believe that this new citizenship legislation is anti-immigrant, anti-Canadian, anti-democratic and unconstitutional, and are seeking to have it struck down,” BCCLA said in a statement.

The lawsuit argues that the new Citizenship Act, as amended by Bill C-24, creates a two-tier citizenship regime that discriminates against dual nationals, whether born abroad or in Canada, and naturalized citizens. These Canadians have been made second-class citizens and will now have more limited citizenship rights compared to other Canadians, simply because they or their parents or ancestors were born in another country, the statement of claim said.

“We believe that this new citizenship legislation is anti-immigrant, anti-Canadian, anti-democratic and unconstitutional…”

– BCCLA

Under the new law, these Canadians could see their citizenship taken away if convicted of certain serious crimes in Canada or abroad (including in a country that does not have due process or rule of law). New Canadians who became citizens after the passage of Bill C-24 could also lose their citizenship if they move abroad for work, school, or family reasons.

Canadians who do not have another nationality, or who are ineligible for one, can move wherever they like and will not lose their Canadian citizenship under any circumstance. For these first-class citizens, Canadian citizenship is absolute and permanent.

“Our lawsuit claims that the new law violates sections 6 (mobility rights), 7 (protection of life, liberty and security of the person), 11(h) and (i) (procedural protections for individuals who have been charged with an offence), 12 (protection from cruel and unusual treatment or punishment) and 15 (equality rights) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and are not justifiable in a free and democratic society,” the group claim.

The case will be heard in Ontario by a Federal Court. The BCCLA and CARL are represented by Lorne Waldman of Waldman and Associates and Marlys Edward and Daniel Sheppard of Goldblatt Partners LLP.

Share.

About Author

The MetroVan Independent News team is a group of talented individuals uniting to serve their community through the power of words. They strive for accuracy, fairness, transparency and accountability aiming to engage, inform and entertain their readers. The team's secret weapon is courage and integrity... with a hint of adobo.

Comments are closed.